Why conflicts hiring should not be rushed
Decisive hiring is not the same as rushed hiring. While the pressure to clear a backlog of matter openings can be immense, a poor hire in a conflicts role often creates more risk than an empty desk. This guide explains how to maintain a fast recruitment process without compromising on the technical judgment and accuracy essential for protecting the firm.
The short answer
Conflicts hiring should move quickly, but it should not be rushed.
Poor conflicts hiring can create quality issues, bottlenecks and risk. The role requires accuracy, judgement and careful escalation. A fast process is useful only if it still tests those qualities properly.
The aim is decisive hiring, not careless hiring.
Why do firms rush conflicts hiring?
Conflicts vacancies often become urgent because work backs up quickly.
Matter opening slows. Partners complain. Existing team members become stretched. Managers absorb too much complex work.
In that pressure, the firm may be tempted to hire the first available person.
That can create problems later.
What can go wrong?
A weak hire may miss relevant issues, over-escalate routine matters, struggle with systems, communicate poorly with fee earners or require more supervision than expected.
This may increase pressure on the existing team rather than reduce it.
In conflicts work, accuracy and judgement matter.
How can firms move quickly but safely?
Prepare the brief before launch. Define the level of experience needed. Use targeted interview questions. Include a practical scenario. Keep the process short but structured.
For analyst roles, one strong interview and a practical exercise may be enough. For senior roles, a second stage with Risk leadership may be appropriate.
What should be tested?
Test attention to detail, analytical thinking, escalation judgement, communication and ability to work under pressure.
Do not rely only on system experience. Different firms use different systems. Underlying judgement is more important.
When can firms compromise?
Firms can compromise on exact system experience, sector background for junior roles or title history.
They should be more cautious about compromising on accuracy, judgement, communication and integrity.
Bottom line
Conflicts hiring should be fast, but structured.
The cost of a weak hire can be greater than the cost of a short, disciplined assessment process. Hire decisively, but do not skip judgement.
Want to know more?
